Comments on: E-14 Pointers https://www.emblogic.com/blog/08/e-14-pointers/ Embedded System and ARM Training Mon, 07 Oct 2013 04:00:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1 By: kumar.sanjeev https://www.emblogic.com/blog/08/e-14-pointers/#comment-1977 Thu, 06 Sep 2012 06:31:10 +0000 http://emblogic.org/blog/?p=5139#comment-1977 maybe the *ptr in ur case is pointing to some address outside its own memory segment.

]]> By: ayush.gupta https://www.emblogic.com/blog/08/e-14-pointers/#comment-1967 Wed, 05 Sep 2012 15:47:41 +0000 http://emblogic.org/blog/?p=5139#comment-1967 My system is still giving segmentation fault. I can’t find the reason why the code isn’t giving any output?

]]> By: manoj https://www.emblogic.com/blog/08/e-14-pointers/#comment-1878 Mon, 03 Sep 2012 05:30:41 +0000 http://emblogic.org/blog/?p=5139#comment-1878 Well,

On my system it is running very well.. although it should be a segmentation fault in the last print i.e. *ptr… but it is giving some output. But first two are absolutely correct.. no segmentation fault is there..

]]> By: ayush.gupta https://www.emblogic.com/blog/08/e-14-pointers/#comment-1840 Sat, 01 Sep 2012 21:10:03 +0000 http://emblogic.org/blog/?p=5139#comment-1840 char *ptr;
printf(“Address allocated to ptr is %p\n ptr pointing to garbage address %p\n which holds the garbage value %c\n”,&ptr,ptr,*ptr);

gives segmentation fault (core dumped).
It should at least print the address and garbage value… still facing error.

]]> By: manoj https://www.emblogic.com/blog/08/e-14-pointers/#comment-1813 Sat, 01 Sep 2012 04:38:45 +0000 http://emblogic.org/blog/?p=5139#comment-1813 show the code..

sometimes it depends on, how you are printing..

]]>