Comments on: problem in execution https://www.emblogic.com/blog/07/problem-in-execution-2/ Embedded System and ARM Training Mon, 07 Oct 2013 04:00:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1 By: Nishant https://www.emblogic.com/blog/07/problem-in-execution-2/#comment-1027 Sun, 22 Jul 2012 17:32:25 +0000 http://emblogic.org/blog/?p=4058#comment-1027 no arjumand this is wrong output.
the actual output is 55355 and the reason is in heamnt’s comment….

]]> By: Nishant https://www.emblogic.com/blog/07/problem-in-execution-2/#comment-1026 Sun, 22 Jul 2012 17:30:45 +0000 http://emblogic.org/blog/?p=4058#comment-1026 thanx for the help hemant i also conclude this reason for the problem…….

]]> By: hemant.kumar https://www.emblogic.com/blog/07/problem-in-execution-2/#comment-1025 Sun, 22 Jul 2012 08:43:30 +0000 http://emblogic.org/blog/?p=4058#comment-1025 your output should be 5 5 3 5 5
1st step: your execution will start from right to left.
2nd step:remember this point when you use PRE INCREEMENT operator i.e (++i) ,it takes the last updated value of i

for example..
let i=1;
printf(“%d %d %d %d \n”,++i,++i,++i,++i);
your output would be 5 5 5 5
because the last updated value in i is 5;

and in your case
i=1;
prntf(“%d %d %d %d %d\n”,i,++i,i++,++i,++i)
taking from the right side
2
3
3
5
5(last updated value is 5)
so wherever you have declared the ++i operator replace it with 5 but in case of post increement operator (i++)it would be 3

]]> By: arjumand https://www.emblogic.com/blog/07/problem-in-execution-2/#comment-1005 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:55:36 +0000 http://emblogic.org/blog/?p=4058#comment-1005 the output should be 5 5 5 5 5

but i know it will be incorrect for one of the operators for sure ;)

]]>