Comments on: Order of Precedence https://www.emblogic.com/blog/07/order-of-precedence/ Embedded System and ARM Training Mon, 07 Oct 2013 04:00:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.1 By: Kuldeep Dhanotia https://www.emblogic.com/blog/07/order-of-precedence/#comment-276 Sat, 01 Oct 2011 13:40:31 +0000 http://emblogic.org/blog/?p=787#comment-276 sir actually he want assurance of his observation

]]> By: m.siddarth https://www.emblogic.com/blog/07/order-of-precedence/#comment-187 Sat, 23 Jul 2011 06:08:19 +0000 http://emblogic.org/blog/?p=787#comment-187 Could you elaborate the question? So that it would help us to solve us more precisely.

]]> By: kamran ali https://www.emblogic.com/blog/07/order-of-precedence/#comment-186 Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:02:18 +0000 http://emblogic.org/blog/?p=787#comment-186 In the case of same operator existing in the mathematical equation in C.
The complier will start to compile for left to right ( for your case).
and the complier will take it as
(a-b)-c;

To elaborate it more, in some case, different operator of same priority can exist in same equation.
ex: a=3/2*5;
Here / and * have same priority, so it is up to the complier to evaluate / first and * second and vica versa is also true.

So to overcome such a problem use brackets.
ex:
a=(3/2)*5; output : 5
a=3/(2*5); output : 0

]]>